The Run Testers
Puma Deviate Pure Nitro review by The Run Testers
Unsponsored review · High trust · Independent
Evidence-backed review
The evidence indicates the Puma Deviate Pure Nitro is a compelling choice, es.
Updated Aug 17, 2026
Buy
Buy if Runners prioritizing speed and responsiveness in a daily trainer.
High evidence confidence · 99/100

Puma
Uncategorized
Reviewed
25 claims checked across 6 evidence categories
Claims checked: 25 · Verified sources: 12 · Evidence categories: 6 · Open questions: 3 · High evidence confidence · 99/100
We check the product questions most likely to affect a buying decision. Open any item to see the supporting sources, agreement, and limitations.
The Puma Deviate Pure Nitro is praised for its lightness and nimble feel, making it suitable for steady, tempo, and short interval speed workouts. However, it lacks a plate or significant rocker, limiting its effectiveness for long, sustained fast efforts or race paces.
Moderate agreement · 1 source supports
It works better as a recovery or general daily trainer than a speed shoe.
Moderate agreement · 1 source supports
Compared with adidas Adizero Evo SL and Saucony Endorphin Azura, Puma Deviate Pure Nitro sits in the same performance-trainer conversation rather than clearly dominating it.
Moderate agreement · 1 source supports
The Puma Deviate Pure Nitro weighs 217g (UK 8.5) while the ASICS Novablast 6 weighs 262g (UK 9), making the Puma significantly lighter.
Moderate agreement · 1 source supports
The ASICS Novablast 6 has a heel stack height of 41.5mm and forefoot of 33.5mm, which is more than the Puma Deviate Pure Nitro's 38mm heel and 30mm forefoot.
Moderate agreement · 1 source supports
Multiple reviewers found the ASICS Novablast 6 to fit true to size, offering a very comfortable experience with ample padding, a roomy forefoot, and good midfoot lockdown.
Moderate agreement · 1 source supports
The Puma Deviate Pure Nitro is generally comfortable but noted as having a narrower fit compared to the Novablast 6. One reviewer recommended going half a size down, especially if between sizes, due to Puma's tendency to run long.
Moderate agreement · 1 source supports
The ASICS Novablast 6 excels in comfort and stability, with a soft, wide base that protects legs on long, easy runs. The FF Turbo Squared foam enhances responsiveness, making it surprisingly capable for tempo workouts and more versatile for speed than previous versions.
Moderate agreement · 1 source supports
The shoe is lightweight and versatile for daily training.
Moderate agreement · 1 source supports
The shoe is versatile across easy runs, workouts, and races.
Moderate agreement · 1 source supports
The shoe feels high quality, fits well, and has excellent traction.
Moderate agreement · 1 source supports
Puma Deviate Pure Nitro is a strong all-around trainer that works well for easy runs and tempo sessions, but it is not the fastest option in its class.
Moderate agreement · 1 source supports
The ASICS Novablast 6 uses a comfort-focused woven upper, a midsole combining FF BLAST Max and FF Turbo Squared, and a dual-material outsole with ASICS grip for traction and high abrasion rubber for durability.
Moderate agreement · 1 source supports
The Puma Deviate Pure Nitro features a "fantastic" Puma Grip outsole with a really thick layer and extensive coverage, which the reviewer states is better than the ASICS Novablast 6's outsole.
Moderate agreement · 1 source supports
Initial impressions may improve after break-in, but evidence is limited.
Moderate agreement · 1 source supports
The ASICS Novablast 6 is slightly more expensive than the Puma Deviate Pure Nitro.
Moderate agreement · 1 source supports
The ride lacks bounce and energy return compared with expectations.
Moderate agreement · 1 source supports
The Puma Deviate Pure Nitro has a stripped-back design, a PEBA Nitro foam midsole, and a thick, grippy PumaGrip outsole with good coverage.
Moderate agreement · 1 source supports
The shoe performs well on long runs.
Moderate agreement · 1 source supports
It is not as fast as some rivals.
Moderate agreement · 1 source supports
The shoe has strong grip and a steady platform.
Moderate agreement · 1 source supports
It is less protective than dedicated marathon racers.
Moderate agreement · 1 source supports
The Deviate Pure NITRO is lighter and more stable than the adidas Adizero Evo SL.
Moderate agreement · 1 source supports
It offers more ground feel and less upfront protection.
Moderate agreement · 1 source supports
RTINGS positions Puma Deviate Pure Nitro as Puma’s best shoe for tempo training.
Moderate agreement · 1 source supports
Long-term durability of midsole cushioning and upper materials.
Limited evidence · What we still need: Seek out reviews with higher mileage tests or long-term user feedback.
Subjective comfort and fit for various foot types and biomechanics.
Limited evidence · What we still need: Try the shoes on in-store if possible, or consult diverse user reviews.
Performance across a wider range of paces and distances, beyond general daily training.
Limited evidence · What we still need: Look for specific reviews focused on race performance or very long-distance runs.
Video reviews and demonstrations that help validate the checked claims.
The Run Testers
Puma Deviate Pure Nitro review by The Run Testers
Unsponsored review · High trust · Independent
Owner reports · 6 · Lab tested · 3 · Directly tested · 1 · Editorial review · 1 · Creator review · 1
Source timeline for reference.
No evidence items yet.
ASICS
Offers more stack height, a softer, more stable ride, and a roomier fit for max comfort.
Saucony
Saucony Kinvara 15
A lightweight, responsive daily trainer known for a direct feel and versatility.
Ask labels follow ask-claim-status-v1. How Ask labels a claim →
The evidence indicates the Puma Deviate Pure Nitro is a compelling choice, es…