Multiple Brands · Supplements · Reviewed by Trustified · Published 2026-07-03
Based on a review by Trustified (accessed 2026-07-03).
This page converts Trustified's review of the Multiple Brands Creatine Monohydrate Impurity Lab Test into structured evidence — timestamped claims, pros & cons, and buyer questions. It is not the original review and does not replace watching or reading the full source.
Product Evidence hub pending. This is currently the only analysed source for this product. A full evidence hub becomes available once a second qualifying source is processed.
The reviewer presents the lab results, showing that all tested creatine products (Naturaltein Crea Boost, MB CREAMP, Wellcore, Asitis, Nakpro, Tata 1mg, and Creapure) have impurity levels for DCD, DHT, and Creatinine that are well within the USP safe limits. The video concludes by asking viewers to provide feedback on whether Trustified should proceed with further expensive impurity testing on other certified creatine products.
This Trustified video conducts blind lab testing on seven creatine products to assess their impurity levels, specifically DCD, DHT, and Creatinine. The review also clarifies common misconceptions regarding DHT's link to hair loss and creatinine's impact on kidney function, explaining the differences between USP and EFSA standards for these impurities.
This comprehensive lab test analyzes multiple creatine monohydrate supplements for critical impurities, confirming that most brands meet the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) safety limits. The analysis revealed that products like MB CREAMP, Wellcore, Asitis, and Naturaltein Crea Boost consistently showed DCD below 50 PPM, DHT below 5 PPM, and creatinine below 100 PPM, with others like Nakpro and Creapure also well within acceptable ranges. A significant clarification is made regarding DHT, distinguishing between creatine's Dihydrotriazine impurity and the hair loss-related Dihydrotestosterone hormone. If you prioritize verified purity and safety in your creatine, this review provides reassuring data on several accessible brands. However, if you are seeking the absolute highest purity levels based on EFSA's extremely stringent 'best manufacturer' criteria, the video highlights the challenges in achieving these due to manufacturing and storage complexities.
measurement_claimstrong
measurement_claimstrong
measurement_claimstrong
reviewer_claimstrong
reviewer_claimstrong
reviewer_claimstrong
specification_claimneutralt=01:00–01:29
Commercial creatine, produced through chemical processes in factories, can result in unwanted compounds called impurities such as DCD, DHT, and Creatinine. DCD and DHT are mainly by-products of the manufacturing process.
Source location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zw495BgwEPs
reviewer_claimneutralt=01:29–02:00
The DHT impurity in creatine is Dihydrotriazine, which is completely different from Dihydrotestosterone, the hormone associated with hair loss. Despite sharing the same short form, these are entirely different compounds with no relation.
Source location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zw495BgwEPs
reviewer_claimneutralt=02:00–02:30
Creatinine is a natural breakdown product of creatine. It can form during manufacturing or increase during storage if the product is exposed to excessive heat, moisture, or poor storage conditions.
Source location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zw495BgwEPs
expert_opinionneutralt=02:30–03:15
According to the US FDA, trace levels of creatinine impurity found in supplement-grade creatine are not considered harmful or nephrotoxic for kidneys. Testing for this impurity helps understand creatine degradation and product quality.
Source location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zw495BgwEPs
specification_claimneutralt=03:25–03:52
The United States Pharmacopeia (USP) sets safe limits for creatine impurities: DCD should not exceed 1000 PPM, DHT not more than 5 PPM, and Creatinine not more than 1000 PPM.
Source location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zw495BgwEPs
measurement_testpositivet=03:52–04:15
Naturaltein Crea Boost showed DCD below 50 PPM, DHT below 5 PPM, and Creatinine below 100 PPM, all within USP safe limits.
Source location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zw495BgwEPs
measurement_testpositivet=04:15–04:28
MB CREAMP showed DCD below 50 PPM, DHT below 5 PPM, and Creatinine below 100 PPM, all within USP safe limits.
Source location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zw495BgwEPs
measurement_testpositivet=04:28–04:39
Wellcore showed DCD below 50 PPM, DHT below 5 PPM, and Creatinine below 100 PPM, all within USP safe limits.
Source location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zw495BgwEPs
measurement_testpositivet=04:39–04:50
Asitis showed DCD below 50 PPM, DHT below 5 PPM, and Creatinine below 100 PPM, all within USP safe limits.
Source location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zw495BgwEPs
measurement_testpositivet=04:50–05:07
Nakpro showed DCD below 50 PPM, DHT below 5 PPM, and Creatinine at 108 PPM, which is within the USP safe limit of 1000 PPM.
Source location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zw495BgwEPs
measurement_testpositivet=05:07–05:13
Tata 1mg's impurity report showed DCD below 50 PPM, DHT below 5 PPM, and Creatinine below 100 PPM, all well within USP safe limits.
Source location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zw495BgwEPs
measurement_testpositivet=05:13–05:28
Creapure (German Creatine) showed DCD below 50 PPM, DHT below 5 PPM, and Creatinine at 136 PPM, which is well within the USP safe limit of 1000 PPM.
Source location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zw495BgwEPs
comparisonneutralt=05:43–07:12
USP limits are comprehensive, considering purity, acceptable consumer safety levels, product quality, reliable testing, and manufacturing standards, based on toxicology, safety data, and real-world use. EFSA limits, conversely, indicate purity achievable by best manufacturers based on highly purified samples, not direct consumer safety.
Source location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zw495BgwEPs
Trustified's blind lab tests on Naturaltein Crea Boost, MB CREAMP, Wellcore, Asitis, Nakpro, Tata 1mg, and Creapure (German Creatine) found that all had DCD levels below 50 PPM, DHT levels below 5 PPM, and Creatinine levels below 136 PPM. These results are significantly below the USP safe limits of 1000 PPM for DCD, 5 PPM for DHT, and 1000 PPM for Creatinine, indicating these products are safe concerning these impurities.
The reviewer clarifies that the DHT (Dihydrotriazine) found as an impurity in creatine is a distinct chemical compound from Dihydrotestosterone, the hormone associated with hair loss. Despite sharing the same acronym, they are completely different substances and creatine's DHT impurity does not lead to hair loss.
Creatinine is a natural breakdown product of creatine. While it's considered an impurity because it offers no performance benefits, the US FDA states that trace levels commonly found in supplement-grade creatine are not harmful or nephrotoxic for kidney function. Its presence primarily serves as an indicator of product degradation, purity, and storage quality.
Trustified utilizes USP limits for assessing creatine impurity safety because they are established based on various factors including toxicology studies, safety data, historical use, product testing, quality, and real-world application, defining acceptable safety and quality levels for consumers. This approach is preferred over EFSA limits, which primarily reflect the purity achievable by manufacturers with the best technology rather than direct consumer safety benchmarks.
60/100 source quality
Trustified, an India-based blind testing certification program, performed lab tests on seven creatine products to check for DCD, DHT, and Creatinine impurities. The video dispels the myth that creatine's DHT impurity causes hair loss, clarifying it's a different compound than the hormone Dihydrotestosterone. It also states that trace levels of creatinine in supplements are not harmful to kidneys according to the US FDA. All tested products, including both Indian brands and German Creapure, were found to have impurity levels within the internationally recognized USP safe limits. The reviewer highlights USP's comprehensive safety focus compared to EFSA's purity-centric standards.
Full transcript is not redistributed here to respect the original creator’s rights.